What are the strengths of the Ontological Argument for God's existence

To asses the authorisations of the ontological Argument for matinee idols pull throughence, we firstly need to break what it entails. The ontological Argument looks at proof A Priori, which is Analytical truth, cerebrate establish proof. This can be explained by saying 1+1=2. We know this to be true, as it is based on reasoning, and is a logical statement. This can be seen as a strength of the Ontological Argument, the accompaniment that it is logical and rational. It deals with knowledge gained independently of experience, unlearned knowledge. It does not occasion any external evidence, it just now uses the translation of the book of account God. It therefore claims that if you understand what God is, then you understand that he must embody. St. Anselm, an Archbishop of Canterbury, first proposed the Ontological Argument in his book Proslogian, according to Anselm, both theists and atheists fork out a translation of God, if precisely for atheists to dismiss his exi stence. Therefore, Anselm claims, God exists in the mind. This could be considered a strength of the Ontological Argument for Gods existence. The fact that if you use the word God, then you, yourself must have an sagaciousness of the meaning of the word. To use the word we show we have an bringing close together of God which exists in our minds. However, existing in the mind is unmatched thing, but to exist in reality is another. Lord, not just now are You that then which nought greater can be conceived but you are also something greater than can be conceived St. Anselm, Proslogion. As Anselm states above, God is that which nothing greater can be conceived, therefore not only must he exist in the mind, but in reality. This is because it is greater to exist in reality than simply in the mind. There is strength in... If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com< /a>

If you want to get a full essay! , visit our page: write my paper